ASSESSMENT OF MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS IN TOMATO HYBRIDS FOR IMPROVED CULTIVATION PRACTICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/basrj.v2023i1.8Keywords:
tomato, genotypes, hybrids, maturity, pests, pathogensAbstract
Tomato is widely used as a vegetable and plays an important role in the diet for its health benefits. The present research was carried out at the vegetable section of Barani Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Chakwal, Pakistan, during the summer season of 2022. The experimental material used for the present study comprised 8 genotypes of tomato. Plant material was collected from the vegetable section of the plant breeding and genetics department in BARI Chakwal. Indeterminate genotype used for morphological characterization was LITH-904, LITH-908, LITH-942, LITH-949, LITH-970, SANDEL-F1, SAHEL-F1, and ANNA-F1. These genotypes were analyzed based on different morphological parameters. The observations recorded were subjected to different statistical analyses, and significant variations were observed among all the genotypes. The advantages of hybrid tomato cultivars are uniformity in shape and size, increased vigor, early maturity, high-yield, and resistance to specific pests and pathogens. The growth characteristics varied significantly among different tomato hybrids. The present research was conducted to evaluate different indeterminate tomato hybrids through various qualitative and quantitative traits to boost the future breeding programs of tomatoes to develop new high-yielding varieties. High yield and good processing qualities are the pre-requisites for the general acceptance of the hybrid by the farmers and the end consumer.
References
Peralta, I. E., Spooner, D. M., & Knapp, S. (2008). Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect. Lycopersicoides, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Systematic botany monographs, 84, 151–160.
Aaliya, K., Qamar, Z., Ahmad, N. I., Ali, Q., Munim, F. A., & Husnain, T. (2016). Transformation, evaluation of gtgene and multivariate genetic analysis for morpho-physiological and yield attributing traits in Zea mays. Genetika, 48(1), 423-433.
Abbas, H. G., Mahmood, A., & Ali, Q. (2015). Genetic variability and correlation analysis for various yield traits of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Agricultural Research, 53(4), 481-491.
Abbas, H. G., Mahmood, A., & Ali, Q. (2016). Zero tillage: a potential technology to improve cotton yield. Genetika, 48(2), 761-776.
Ahmad, H. M., Ahsan, M., Ali, Q., & Javed, I. (2012). Genetic variability, heritability and correlation studies of various quantitative traits of mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) at different radiation levels. International Research Journal of Microbiology, 3(11), 352-362.
Ali, F., Ahsan, M., Ali, Q., & Kanwal, N. (2017). Phenotypic stability of Zea mays grain yield and its attributing traits under drought stress. Frontiers in plant science, 8, 1397.
Ali, Q., Ahsan, M., Ali, F., Aslam, M., Khan, N. H., Munzoor, M., ... & Muhammad, S. (2013). Heritability, heterosis and heterobeltiosis studies for morphological traits of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Advancements in Life Sciences, 1(1):52-63.
Ali, Q., Ahsan, M., Kanwal, N., Ali, F., Ali, A., Ahmed, W., ... & Saleem, M. (2016). Screening for drought tolerance: comparison of maize hybrids under water deficit condition. Advancements in Life Sciences, 3(2), 51-58.
Ali, Q., Ali, A., Ahsan, M., Nasir, I. A., Abbas, H. G., & Ashraf, M. A. (2014a). Line× Tester analysis for morpho-physiological traits of Zea mays L seedlings. Advancements in Life sciences, 1(4), 242-253.
Ali, Q., Ali, A., Awan, M. F., Tariq, M., Ali, S., Samiullah, T. R., ... & Hussain, T. (2014b). Combining ability analysis for various physiological, grain yield and quality traits of Zea mays L. Life Sci J, 11(8s), 540-551.
Blanca, J., Canizares, J., Cordero, L., Pascual, L., Diez, M. J., & Nuez, F. (2012). Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PloS one, 7(10), e48198.
Domínguez, R., Gullón, P., Pateiro, M., Munekata, P. E., Zhang, W., & Lorenzo, J. M. (2020). Tomato as potential source of natural additives for meat industry. A review. Antioxidants, 9(1), 73.
El-Aziz, A., Farid, S., & Elkomey, S. (2016). Evaluation of molecular and phenotypic diversity in relation to heterosis in some tomato lines under different climatic conditions. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 7(5), 141-151.
EL-Mansy, A. B., Abd El-Moneim, D., ALshamrani, S. M., Safhi, F. A., Abdein, M. A., & Ibrahim, A. A. (2021). Genetic diversity analysis of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) with morphological, cytological, and molecular markers under heat stress. Horticulturae, 7(4), 65.
FAOSTAT. Crops: Tomatoes. 2019-20. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/ar/#data/QC
Hafeez, M. N., Khan, M. A., Sarwar, B., Hassan, S., Ali, Q., Husnain, T., & Rashid, B. (2021). Mutant Gossypium universal stress protein-2 (GUSP-2) gene confers resistance to various abiotic stresses in E. coli BL-21 and CIM-496-Gossypium hirsutum. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 20466.
Javed, I., Ahsan, M., Ahmad, H. M., & Ali, Q. (2016). Role of mutation breeding to improve Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) yield: An overview. Nature Science, 14(1), 63-77
Lu, Z., Wang, J., Gao, R., Ye, F., & Zhao, G. (2019). Sustainable valorisation of tomato pomace: A comprehensive review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 86, 172-187.
Paulino, S. L. J., Adrián, Á. T. G., Gabriela, E. A. L., Maribel, V. M., & Sergio, M. G. (2020). Nutraceutical potential of flours from tomato by-product and tomato field waste. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 57, 3525-3531.
Puspito, A. N., Rao, A. Q., Hafeez, M. N., Iqbal, M. S., Bajwa, K. S., Ali, Q., ... & Husnain, T. (2015). Transformation and evaluation of Cry1Ac+ Cry2A and GTGene in Gossypium hirsutum L. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 943
Salehi, B., Sharifi-Rad, R., Sharopov, F., Namiesnik, J., Roointan, A., Kamle, M., ... & Sharifi-Rad, J. (2019). Beneficial effects and potential risks of tomato consumption for human health: An overview. Nutrition, 62, 201-208.
Salim, M. M. R., Rashid, M. H., Hossain, M. M., & Zakaria, M. (2020). Morphological characterization of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 19(3), 233-240.
Siddiqui, M. H., Alamri, S., Alsubaie, Q. D., Ali, H. M., Khan, M. N., Al-Ghamdi, A., ... & Alsadon, A. (2020). Exogenous nitric oxide alleviates sulfur deficiency-induced oxidative damage in tomato seedlings. Nitric Oxide, 94, 95-107.
Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A biometrical approach. 3rd ed. WCB/McGraw Hill, Inc. New York, USA.
Wang, L. J., Gao, M. D., Sheng, M. Y., & Yin, J. (2020). Cluster analysis of karyotype similarity coefficients in Epimedium (Berberidaceae): insights in the systematics and evolution. PhytoKeys, 161, 11.
Zafar, M. M., Mustafa, G., Shoukat, F., Idrees, A., Ali, A., Sharif, F., ... & Li, F. (2022). Heterologous expression of cry3Bb1 and cry3 genes for enhanced resistance against insect pests in cotton. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 10878.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 N KHAN, ZU ABIDEEN, A RAFIQUE, A HUSSAIN, M OSAMA, A RAUF

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. © The Author(s)